Substack’s new Pangram check can tell you AI touched a sentence. It can’t tell you whether a human stood behind it. Why that gap punishes writers like me.
Daniel, this is an important challenge to a crude proxy. A reader cares whether a human mind stood behind the thought, not which tool touched the final English. For multilingual writers especially, assistance can preserve authorship by helping the original meaning cross a language boundary. Trust should measure disclosure and responsibility, not stylistic conformity.
Andreas, thank you so much for your meaningful comment. Exactly! I'm all in for personal freedom of choice. The reader decides what deserves attention and thought. Nothing else.
Daniel, this is an important challenge to a crude proxy. A reader cares whether a human mind stood behind the thought, not which tool touched the final English. For multilingual writers especially, assistance can preserve authorship by helping the original meaning cross a language boundary. Trust should measure disclosure and responsibility, not stylistic conformity.
Andreas, thank you so much for your meaningful comment. Exactly! I'm all in for personal freedom of choice. The reader decides what deserves attention and thought. Nothing else.