🐝🌿“Why Charlie Kirk’s Death Cuts Deeper.”
I don't worship anybody. But this loss hurts different.
Hi,
I’ve never been the type to worship anyone.
Not politicians, not celebrities, not so-called “thought leaders.” That’s just not me.
But the news of Charlie Kirk’s death… that one hit differently.
And no, it’s not because I was his “fan.”
It’s because I deeply respected his courage to stand where others cowered. Most of the time, I found myself on the same page with him—especially when he dismantled the shaky narratives around gender politics, when he suspected Big Pharma’s hand behind the push for hormone treatments.
Or when he called out malpractice from doctors who convinced children to “change” the very identity that was given by Nature, by God, or by the Universe (whatever name you prefer for the higher order that governs life).
That kind of clarity, that kind of sharpness in debate, is rare. His ability to think on his feet, to respond with precision. That’s the dream of any public speaker.
And that’s exactly why losing a voice like his cuts so deep.
Because here’s the real wound: when we silence voices—especially those we disagree with—we don’t just lose opinions. We lose freedom.
And freedom is certainly not a coincidence.
In the FARMISH mindset I teach, the “F” stands for exactly that: Freedom.
Freedom of thought.
Freedom of speech.
Freedom to question.
Freedom to choose how we live, how we raise our children, how we build our future.
Charlie fought for that.
Not perfectly, not always in ways everyone liked, but fearlessly.
And in today’s climate, that kind of fearlessness matters.
When we stop asking questions, when we shut the mouths of others—especially when they come from the “other side”—society becomes brittle. Dangerous. And history has shown us what happens when that slope gets slippery.
That’s why I’m unusually sad about this tragic news. Because it’s not just the death of a man—it’s a warning.
A warning that our world is becoming less tolerant of truth-tellers. A warning that we’re losing patience for debate. A warning that freedom itself is under attack, and not just in Washington, but in our own communities, families, and businesses.
I hope justice will be served quickly. Would it surprise anyone if the attack turns out to be the act of a disturbed individual under the influence of the very treatments Charlie so often warned us about?
Sadly, no.
But beyond that speculation, here’s the bigger question I want to leave you with:
If we don’t stand for freedom of thought and speech—what’s left?
Stay fearless,
Daniel
Even if you did not know who Charlie Kirk was or you did not agree or like him, this is a wake up call to what our society has become. I have learned to keep my political beliefs quiet but this was not always the case. I can remember having discussions with friends/family who had different values and beliefs than me and we could have civil discourse and debate, still love each other and move on. The last decade things changed and Charlie Kirk, saw that and wanted to bring back civil discourse and debate no matter what your beliefs were. He was strong in what he believed in, Faith, Family and Country. He believed in freedom of those beliefs and freedom of speak and the very pretence that the United States of America were built upon. And this is coming from a Canadian. I am saddened by the thought that if you do not believe the same as others, the answer is violence.